http://time.com/
viernes, 4 de julio de 2014
DE CUÑADOS Y CUÑADAS
http://masclaroagua.blogspot.com.es/
Comentábamos esta mañana, durante el cafecito mediomañanero, la oportuna aparición del cuñado de Diego Torres echando la culpa de todo el trapicheo choricero de Nóos y Aizoon -que no es lo mismo pero es igual- a Urdangarin y su ex (socio). Así, de facto, exculpa a la Infanta y aquí paz y en el cielo gloria. Muy oportuno todo, sí. Por la tarde, al llegar a casa y leer el periódico, me encuentro que no éramos los únicos que habíamos tenido esta idea. C'est la vie!
Mientras, desde tierras suizas, el jeta de Urdangarin dice que hizo negocios "por su preparación" y no por ser el yerno del rey. ¡JAJAJAJAJA!
jueves, 3 de julio de 2014
AY PAULINO
Así es nuestro Presidente del Gobierno (de la Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias). Inclasificable.
PD. Padilla, lo has clavado.
miércoles, 2 de julio de 2014
martes, 1 de julio de 2014
¡¡NOS PLANTAMOS!!
Una viñetista del ‘Huffington
Post’ anuncia que no colaborará más con ese medio por censurar críticas a la
monarquía
'Atxe' explica que es la primera
vez que le pasaba algo así y aclara que no renuncia a un trabajo sino "a
mi escaparate, lo que rebaja el nivel de heroicidad".
ELPLURAL.COM | 25/06/2014
Después de todo el revuelo que se
ha montado con la portada censurada de El Jueves relativa a la
abdicación del rey, tras la proclamación de Felipe VI se produce una nueva
polémica en torno a posibles vetos. Atxe, una colaboradora de El Huffington Post, ha anunciado vía twitter que no
participará más en el medio tras la decisión del medio de PRISA de no publicar
“viñetas críticas con la monarquía”.
Una decisión sin precedentes
Más adelante ha ampliado las explicaciones en su blog, apuntando que ese medio normalmente tarde entre 2 y 6 días en publicar las colaboraciones que mandan pero en el caso de una viñeta crítica con la monarquía pasaron dos semanas sin que viera la luz, y a otra compañera le pasó lo mismo. Cuando preguntaron “la respuesta en los dos casos fue igual: no convenció a la directora y no se iba a publicar”. Argumenta que era la primera vez en año y medio que le pasaba algo así: “Sólo hubo una excepción, en la que representé un símbolo religioso e, instantáneamente, me avisaron de que lo debía modificar. Es decir, la manera de actuar en un caso y en otro fue muy diferente”. Cuando informó al Huffington de su marcha le pidieron disculpas por no haberle avisado sobre la decisión de no publicar la viñeta. Añade que como no cobra no ha renunciado a un trabajo “sino a mi escaparate, lo que rebaja el nivel de heroicidad”.
Más adelante ha ampliado las explicaciones en su blog, apuntando que ese medio normalmente tarde entre 2 y 6 días en publicar las colaboraciones que mandan pero en el caso de una viñeta crítica con la monarquía pasaron dos semanas sin que viera la luz, y a otra compañera le pasó lo mismo. Cuando preguntaron “la respuesta en los dos casos fue igual: no convenció a la directora y no se iba a publicar”. Argumenta que era la primera vez en año y medio que le pasaba algo así: “Sólo hubo una excepción, en la que representé un símbolo religioso e, instantáneamente, me avisaron de que lo debía modificar. Es decir, la manera de actuar en un caso y en otro fue muy diferente”. Cuando informó al Huffington de su marcha le pidieron disculpas por no haberle avisado sobre la decisión de no publicar la viñeta. Añade que como no cobra no ha renunciado a un trabajo “sino a mi escaparate, lo que rebaja el nivel de heroicidad”.
“Si mi opinión sirve de algo,
dudo mucho que esta decisión provenga de su directora Montserrat Dominguez;
creo que habría que ascender algunos pisos en la empresa para encontrar el
epicentro”, apunta. También ha difundido a través de Twitter la viñeta que no quiso
ser publicada por el medio de PRISA. ELPLURAL.COM ha contactado con El
Huffington Post para conocer su versión y desde prensa de PRISA han
apuntado que la viñeta no se publicó por “criterios editoriales” y no hay nada
extraño, ya que se han publicado muchas críticas a la monarquía “sin ningún
problema”.
WI-FI EN IBERIA
...por un módico precio, eso sí. Algo es algo. Yo soy un ignorante, lo reconozco, pero imagino que algo debe haber cambiado para que ahora sí se pueda usar el móvil o una tablet dentro del avión, porque supongo que el haber pagado no elimina "las posibles interferencias" que nos recuerdan antes de despegar.
A SAD DAY
"Bring back our boys", he aquí la consigna de la campaña mundial pidiendo el regreso de los tres adolescentes judíos secuestrados en Hebrón, Israel. Este deseo, desgraciadamente, ha tenido un triste final al haber encontrado los cuerpos muertos de los tres chicos. Terrible noticia para todos los que creemos en la paz, para los que la impulsamos a nuestra manera y aportamos nuestro pequeño y modestísimo granito de arena. Leía un comentario hace algunos minutos acerca de los funerales en Isreal y alguien escribía que si bien estaba en contra de la violencia también había que ser ecuánime y saber de los funerales de los palestinos muertos. Cierto, respondí, ¡no a la violencia!, pero que Israel no secuestra adolescentes y los mata. Nunca. Todas las muertes son terribles, no cabe duda, pero quizá se haga más duro intentar entender cómo se asesina a sangre fría a unos jóvenes que están empezando a vivir, por el mero hecho de ser judíos.
By JPOST.COM STAFF
06/30/2014 20:55.
http://m.jpost.com/HomePage/FrontPage/Article.aspx?id=97361050&cat=1&url=http://www.jpost.com/SpecialReports2/Article.aspx?ID=361050&R=R1
http://m.jpost.com/HomePage/FrontPage/Article.aspx?id=97361050&cat=1&url=http://www.jpost.com/SpecialReports2/Article.aspx?ID=361050&R=R1
A team of civilian volunteers found one body before alerting security forces, who then uncovered the other two. he bodies of Naftali Fraenkel, Eyal Yifrah and Gil-Ad Shaer were found in a cave following a geological survey carried out by civilian volunteers, head of the Kfar Etzion search team Yaron Rozenthal told Channel 10.
"This is a very sad day, but there's also some relief for the country and for the families in the discovery," he said. "In cooperation with the IDF we managed to bring back our boys, although not in the way we'd hoped."
Rozenthal's team of civilian volunteers found one body before alerting security forces, who then uncovered the other two.
The Israeli Teenagers
The yeshiva students disappeared on June 12 while hitchhiking in the West Bank.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/01/world/middleeast/Israel-missing-teenagers.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=HpSum&module=first-column-region%C2%AEion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1
- Eyal Yifrach, 19From Elad, an ultra-Orthodox town in central Israel. Searchers found a smashed pair of his eyeglasses over the weekend, which helped lead them to the bodies. In 2011 he had posted on Facebook about Sgt. Gilad Shalit, the Israeli soldier held captive for five years by Hamas militants in Gaza who was later released.
- Naftali Fraenkel, 16Born in Nof Ayalon, a religious community between Israel and the West Bank; the second of children. His mother, Rachel, said he loved playing basketball and the guitar, fought with his sisters, and had a "cynical sense of humor." Naftali's maternal grandparents emigrated to Israel from New York in the 1950s and he holds joint Israeli and American citizenship. Texted his parents before he disappeared, saying he was going to hitchhike home. “I was praying maybe he did something stupid and irresponsible,” Ms. Fraenkel recalled, “but I know my boy isn’t stupid, and he isn’t irresponsible.”
-
From the settlement of Talmon in the central West Bank. He was a young leader in Bnei Akiva, a popular religious youth movement. Enjoyed baking. "When he came home, his mother would get out of the kitchen," a neighbor said.
▬
Kidnap Denial: Blaming the victim
of tragedy
I had trouble sleeping last
night. Three families are wounded beyond measure. I saw loving kindness in
them. And I saw people who openly blamed them, at their hour of unimaginable
pain, for the murders of their own children.
By Bradley
Burston | Jul. 1, 2014 | 5:27 PM
Three teens are dead. Families
are wounded beyond measure.
There is no solace here. There is
no healing here. There is no learning here, and therefore there is no lesson.
No revenge will do them honor.
We have seen something rare in
these families, a quality of chesed, of loving kindness, that we sorely
miss in this place and time. We
look on kindness with suspicion. We see suffering and ferocity, and all too
often we choose to fight ferocity with ferocity.
We have leaders who offer us no future. They
counsel bitterness. And so we learn nothing. We move nowhere. We nurse pain.
Underlying everything, now and perhaps for as
long as these two peoples shall live - there is a blood feud. There is nothing
else.
All around, at every microphone, at every
inbox, there are people using every means to bend a tragedy to their own ends,
their personal and institutional biases, uses, causes, fund drives. A crime has
been committed, and in its wake, perverse misdemeanors of exploitation.
When the bodies were discovered, even before there
was time to notify the families, activists on both extremes took it upon
themselves to do what they have done so often and so well over the last 18
days:
Kidnap Denial.
Pick an extreme. On the extreme that despises
Israel to death, the primary form which kidnap denial takes, is literal. "The
bodies of three missing Israeli teens - Gil-Ad Shaer,16, Naftali Fraenkel,
16, and Eyal Yifrah, 19 – were found today in a West Bank field near the
village of Halhul, not far from where they went missing on June 12," wrote
Alex Horowitz, co-editor of the avowedly anti-Israel Mondoweiss.net, in a tone passive enough to cast
or reinforce doubt – much in evidence in some pro-Palestinian circles - as to
whether a crime had been committed at all.
The next form – a litmus test for a certain
form of racism on the hard left - is the idea that the three murder victims had
it coming to them.
When one Mondoweiss reader asked “Can’t we be
sympathetic to three mothers who lost their children without trampling on their
graves?” a second reader was quick to respond:
"No. When have the Zionist Jews been
sympathetic to the mothers of dead Palestinians??? When they begin, then the
feeling should be reciprocated. Until then it simply plays into the bigoted
Zionist narrative.
"And more specifically, I don’t have pity
for these parents, I hold them in contempt. If they were not willing
participants in the theft and occupation of Palestine, their kids would not be
dead. But they loved their demonic ideology more than they loved their
children."
When the first reader suggested "I think
the appropriate response at a time like this is a simple, 'I’m sorry for your
loss,' the second reader replied that "since this people have never
treated the Palestinians with basic human decency, I say to hell with
them."
On the extreme of the hard right, meanwhile,
kidnap denial took the form of taking a tragic and hideous incident, and
putting it to work for divisive, extremist political objectives, often with
overtones of racism against Palestinians in particular and Arabs as a whole.
Minutes after the announcement of the discovery
of the bodies, far-right Likud MK Ze'ev Elkin, chair of the key Knesset Foreign
Affairs and Defense Committee, capped a wish-list of possible anti-Hamas
measures with the following:
"The thing which hurts the Palestinians
the most, and you know this excellently well, is [settlement]
construction," he told Israel Channel 10 News. "Building in Hebron,
in the place from which the murderers came, in order to strengthen the Jewish
settlement there, and building on the place where the bodies were found."
There were other suggestions as
well. Wrote Alan Bergstein, quoted on the far-right Israel Commentary website:
"Not being a citizen of
Israel, I can only hope that they will clean out the Arab residents of Hebron,
where the kidnappers lived, and Gaza, from where rockets are now bombarding
Israel, and send them packing into Arab controlled countries for permanent
relocation."
There's a name for blaming all
members of a group for the actions of a few. Whatever the target group, and no
matter how religious or right-on the person who preaches collective guilt and
advocates collective punishment, it comes out the same: racism.
It's racist if the only murders
and unwarranted deaths you acknowledge, are the ones committed against your
side. It's racist to suggest, as we do all too often on both sides, that the
other had it coming to them.
It's racist if all you can say
about the murder of three Israeli teens is that other Israelis are screaming
"Death to Arabs" – at a time when what is actually happening across
Israel is characterized by genuine grieving, introspection and respectful
measures of mourning.
It's racist to believe that the
lives of Palestinian families are not crushed by the death of a child in
bombing raids or blunt-force, live-fire riot control.
I had trouble sleeping last
night. I saw the faces of three teens, their families wounded beyond measure. I
saw loving kindness in them. And I saw people who openly blamed them, at their
hour of unimaginable pain, for the murders of their own children.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)










































